Tuesday, February 25, 2014

DON'T POLITICIZE MY GRANDKIDS, NIICK



                                         DON’T POLITICIZE MY GRANDKIDS NICK

                                                                                                                                                                          
     Rather than watch the Olympics last Friday evening, I sat down with my grandaughter to watch Nickelodian  (Time Warner), one of her favorite shows.  The episode was a series called Sam and Cat, apparently geared toward pre-teens.  My granddaughter is eight, but precocious.  I wound up watching three episodes run consecutively but my remarks here are specifically directed toward one titled :"Blue Dog Soda,”
     I found all the programs inane—Punch and Judy type slapstick, without any educational merit and, in fact, without any redeeming qualities.  I understand my sense of humor differs from that of children aged eight to twelve.  So be it.  My objections here are the not so subtle attempt to interject conservative political philosophy into a children’s program. 

     Sam and Cat are two attractive e girls, a blond and brunette who star in a TV program for kids their age. Other kids play supporting roles.  In this episode the girls have been surreptitiously manufacturing, bottling, and selling a soda drink called Blue Dog.  A policeman, father to one of the characters, I think, enters and voices his frustration about being unable to capture the persons selling the illegal soda.  They will be severely punished when apprehended.  Sam and Cat, of course, do not reveal that  they are the culprits. The policeman is portrayed as somewhat stupid.  Later the policeman returns, still empty handed.  There is a loud crash from the basement and when he investigates he lerns that this is the source of the contraband.  Rather than appearing contrite, one of the girls offers an argument that criticizes government regulations.  ”What is wrong with the soda?” she asks.  He responds that it has too much sugar, which is unhealthy.  (He leaves out that they are not licensed to manufacture or sell the soda.)  The girls present him with the argument that just because some people abuse something is no excuse for needless regulation.  People should be allowed to regulate themselves. Sounds straight out of a Teaparty handbook.   The policeman immediately capitulates, acknowledging the soundness of the girls’ position.

     The appropriateness of this debate is questionable for this audience but,, if it is introduced,  both sides of the argument should be prsented.  The anti-government regulation message is clear here.  The ignorant, adult policeman is defeated by the wiser pre-teen  girls, who apparently will be allowed to go on selling Blue Dog. 


     Come on, Nick.  entertain kids but keep your politics to yourself.

No comments:

Post a Comment